CCCLXXIX – The Edible Bits of the Rotten Fruit

Wood over at his excellent blog has been on a roll recently and I wanted to expand on some ideas he has introduced.

Trials and Tribe-ulations

One of these ideas is the idea of “tribe”. He has suggested that one of the things that makes the Catholic Church both special and functional is it’s function as a tribe, united by Christian love. The word “tribe” is evocative to me of early human society, based on family units and where all the members work to the good of the whole. The uniting feature of these ancient tribes was blood relation. The undisputed leader of the tribe was usually a paternal or maternal figure and every member of the tribe had some role to play.

The Church is a tribe, united by the blood of the covenant which is thicker than the water of the womb. It is not uncommon to hear people referred to as “brothers and sisters in Christ”, which is both literal (by adoption) and figurative (by tribe). The Catholic Church today is riddled with many illnesses, and one of them is factionalism. But factionalism within the Church comes down to feuds between brothers over who serves Father best. The important thing is indeed serving Father, and if we were able to put aside our pride it would be a lot easier to do that. Remember–do unto others as you would have them do unto you. This is both prescriptive (“I want you to treat me better, so let me show you how to treat me better through my treatment of you”) and aspirational (“I need money so I will be more giving with my own money, so the favor will be returned to me eventually”). This idea is sometimes rendered as the cliché “be the change you want to see in the world”. If you want to heal the Church then begin by healing the church as it exists around you.

A lot of the wounds of the Church are multi generational, so no one alive can really take blame for the problems nor credit for the solutions. We are all just trying to do the best we can with a mixed-bag inheritance. This is my segue into the discussion of what I will call “founding myths”.

Founding Myth Busters

We as human beings are very short sighted to our own lifetimes. We can sometimes directly experience two or three generations of our ancestors and we can sometimes live long enough to directly experience two or three generations of predecessors. And that’s about it–it’s hard for us to fathom anything else. Anything that transcends that timespan is incomprehensible to us and holds a status as something transcendent and mystical. The United States of America, we like to think, has always been the way we experience it now, and the way we experience it now is a modest improvement by the way Grandpappy experienced it, which was already quite good.

I’ll take a digression to talk about major corporations, of all things. I work for a large organization, the employees of which, if gathered into one place, would populate a small town. I remember realizing, slowly, that so much of what makes large organizations persist from one day to the next is sheer willpower. Our recordkeeping systems are fragile, our leaders are flawed, our technology is dated, but everyone keeps showing up for work. My employer, as with every employer, as with every government, as with nearly every institution, only persists because people keep showing up for some reason, and is only one bad day away from complete and utter collapse.

All that to say, if we were to actually look closely at the mystical and transcendent entities that cross our generations–they are much more fragile than we realize. They are also never ever as good as we have been taught.

I remember when I was in 5th grade, on 9/11, I lived close enough to some of the events that kids at my school had parents who could have been at risk. One of my friends mothers came to pick him up from school, but it was lunch time so she came to sit with us at the lunch table. I don’t really know how else to describe her than as a redneck. She was loud, she was unpolished, and she told it like it was. She announced to a table full of 5th graders that “Terrorists blew up the pentagon”. I didn’t believe her–that doesn’t make sense, this is America. That kind of thing isn’t possible here. When I got home from school I got to watch how possible it was on TV, replayed with immodest doom voyeurism for young and impressionable minds like mine to absorb and not understand.

The genius comedian, Norm Macdonald, has a funny quote Hambone shared with me recently: “Hey, it says here in the history books that the good guys won every time! What are the odds of that!”

Our founding myth is the comfortable lie we tell ourselves so we don’t question our base assumptions and can just keep on showing up and keeping the institutions we are a part of moving along from one day to the next. When I recently suggested in an inflammatory thread of my own devising that the American Revolution was an unjust and immoral secession from a legitimate sovereign, it popped some brains who questioned if I was even an American. Hearing this gets some people so utterly flabbergasted–it questions the most fundamental principle of their lives. The sun shines, birds fly, and God Bless America Forever. They look on the world with the same impressionable eyes that I had in 5th grade, and I was immodestly slapping the horse-blinders from their face and expecting them to thank me. Founding Myths are always a lie, because they have to be.

Bastard’s Apple

This is also true in a way of family history. Family Lore is a kind of myth we tell ourselves, to help us feel connected to all the generations we can’t experience. My family happened to make no bones about it’s hubris. My namesake and great grandfather left his wife and started a new family in the Netherlands when my grandfather was very young. It makes our genealogical records somewhat complicated because after a certain point it’s hard to tell where the lineage actually connects. Families and relationships are messy things, and so we smooth over the bad parts and feed our kids the edible bits of the rotten fruit so they get an idealized version of the story, and don’t learn about all the skeletons in the closet. The skeletons aren’t really valuable, but when we go digging and learn about our skeletons, it is always shocking–we have tasted the rest of the rotten fruit, the wormy, moldy bits that don’t sit so well in our stomachs.

My priest told me about this in the context of generational healing. It is possible and important to pray over our family tree. We exist today as the fruit of that tree and any rotten fruit has not fallen far from the tree. Often if we look back far enough we can see repeated variations of the same themes in our family. By praying for healing, we can graft our branch onto the tree of life, and baptize the tree for a while. It takes effort to keep the tree attached, but starting out strong can surely help. In my case, my family was not Catholic when I converted, but I am the only name-bearing male of my generation. Many past Scoot’s have not been Catholic, but every future Scoot of my line will be–at least for a while, God willing. I don’t know how far back I would have to go to find a Catholic member of the Scoot family but I am sure it would take me back to Europe in the 19th century or earlier.

The important thing, then, is not that our past is muddy and rotten and dirty and tarnished. That matters a lot less than the fact that our future can be baptized, healed, and glorified. This is the source of Hope, not just for us, but perhaps for well meaning souls of our ancestors who are waiting in purgatory for someone in their lineage to figure out the right path and pray for them to get over the hump and into heaven.

AMDG

CCCLIII – Gold, God, and Gandalf

In an article about gold recently, I mused on the hypothesis that gold is somehow metaphysically different or special–that God created gold to be special and we human creatures perceive this metaphysical difference. Gold is unique in an ontological sense, not merely in a material sense.

But then–if it is true that God made gold with unique care and a unique purpose, is it not also true that God made iron and copper with the same unique care? So too with Oak and Ash and Acacia, so too with Marble and Granite and Basalt, so too with Apples, Mangos, and Cashews. Far from diminishing the value of Gold by suggesting that everything else was made with the same care and attention, it elevates the world we live in to something mystical and magical. It has become something of a cliche because we don’t have a good context for it, but we were all made with this same unique care and attention.

This calls to mind another of Wood’s posts about strange happenings in the Old Testament. But also, there are no less strange things going on with the saints. The bottom line is that the world we live in is magical.

To be honest, I used Gandalf in the title instead of the word “magic” because I had an alliteration thing going, but now that he’s there, let’s use him. Gandalf was, in the Lord of the Rings, something like an Angel–a wizard, sent by God, to fulfill a specific purpose and do certain things. In a manner of speaking, we are all created by God with this same unique intention. Why else would God give us such a variety of skills and talents; our tapestry of personalities; such a thing as humor? These things are all unique and beautiful. “But Scoot, you have called it ‘magic’ more than once without really explaining what that means?”

When I say we live in a magical world, it means that we live in a miraculous world. That God is intervening at every moment in every minutiae, and some saints get to walk on water or bilocate, some ancient priests got to prophesy using lost artefacts. We witness a miracle every Sunday in the consecration, we experience miraculous healing every time we go to Confession. I have myself, personally, experienced miraculous healing of certain varieties, and I am 100% confident every single one of you reading this have your own personal stories of miraculous and wondrous experiences by the grace of God.

This is what it means to see God everywhere. Not to look at a boulder and think “That is a nice boulder.” But to look at that boulder and see it as connected to everything else, part of a scene which God miraculously contrived over millenia to appear with you in it; for the air you breathe to be the miraculous breathe of life and not mere chemical processes. This is magic because, as Jesus told us, if we had the faith of a mustard seed we could move mountains or walk on water. We don’t need so much faith as a mustard seed to appreciate that God miraculously contrived everything we see, hear, and experience, and to see it as the miracle that it is.

God is humble–He doesn’t sound trumpets every time He moves in the world. He moves in little ways, in each of us, every day. It takes mere belief to see it, it takes love to see it as magic.

AMDG

(b) – Dialectic, Argumentation, and Pig Ignorance

Dialectic: “You and I see things differently. Let’s together attempt to determine what is true by discussing our assumptions and observations.”

Argumentation: “You seem to hold as true something which is, in fact, false. In the following slides I will demonstrate why you are mistaken about your belief.”

Pig Ignorance: “I demand evidence of your claims! First hand! You weren’t there! You don’t have the documents! NUH UH!”

The first two are entirely valid and have an important and worthwhile place in the pursuit of truth. The third knows the first two are words, but doesn’t know the difference.

This has been: Uncharitable Quick-Takes sponsored by Smithfield Hams.

*Afterthought: If this post really was sponsored (it isn’t) I could start doing sports-commentary style snippets with the Smithfield Hams™ Pig-Ignorant Play of the Day.

(p) – Ukraine

In our modern world, there are always three wars that are overlapping: There is the hot war, governed by territorial control; there is the information war governed by the news cycle; there is the diplomatic war governed by international reaction.

I don’t relish the loss of human life, it is important to say. War is a terrible, terrible thing, and should not be discussed lightly, least of all by armchair prognosticators such as myself.

What I find interesting about the war in Ukraine is the change it represents in the global power dynamic. The west has reacted with impotence, and Russia is certain to win the territory war. The diplomatic war feels lost by Russia already, and Russia is at least as good at managing the information war as the West is.

We will see what happens. As you watch events, remember the three wars, and always try to suss out who is winning.

For the sake of his sorrowful passion, have mercy on us, and on the whole world.

CCXLVII – Consistency vs. Accuracy

I have mentioned before that I am an accountant. There’s a phenomenon I have observed wherein accountants want things to look the same, or they want things to look right.

Neither approach is technically wrong, to be clear. It’s just an interesting character trait–how an accountant falls on this dichotomy tells you something about their attitudes as people, and that is what justifies my making this observation on this blog.

The typical relationship accountants have with an organization is something akin to an advisor to a king. We aren’t on the throne, but we are close to it and can see if the king is being listened to. The king might ask us for advice and we will turn to our stacks of ten-column paper to speak the truth to him. We simultaneously monitor the health of the organization and advise as to its management.

Consistency Accounting follows the principle that the performance we see this month should closely resemble the performance we saw last month. The virtues of this include that an accountant will know if anything unusual happens because it will stick out on various reports, and be easily identified as unusual. If you are not familiar with accounting, a term that we live by is “Accrual Accounting” which means that if I pay a bill for a whole years worth of some service–say $12,000 paid in January–I can spread the recognition of that expense out over the whole year. So instead of seeing a $12,000 expense in January, I will see a $1,000 expense in the same place every month for 12 months. Accrual accounting is what makes this possible. Consistency accounting relies on accruals, such that future months can be forecast because much of the activity is being accrued. As such, consistency accounting is something of a procrustean bed whereby transactions are forced to fit into the noise level of normal month-over-month variation.

Accuracy accounting follows the principle that the performance we see this month should reflect events that actually happened. Accuracy accounting still uses accruals, but when something sticks out the question is less “should we have spread this out” and more “did this actually happen”. Sometimes $12,000 expenses happen in a sufficiently large organization without warning. It’s not a failure to recognize it all at once and say “we need warning about this next time”.

I am not a fan of consistency accounting because it loses sight of what is happening and focuses on what we want to happen. It’s the natural result of performance evaluation’s being based on financial results. Middle managers have an incentive to hack the books to save their bonus rather than focus on saving the company.

Not really a point to this, just an observation.

AMDG

CCV – A Ramble About Space

I’ve referred occasionally to the fact that I am a space enthusiast. I’m listening to an instrumental song and watching a montage of Cassini images this morning while simultaneously trying to figure out where and how to direct the desire to write. So why not write a little something on the subject of space.


Popular Science is presently obsessed with Mars and Jupiter. Not without reason, they are fascinating planets but also some of the most extensively observed. I’m almost looking forward to humans going to Mars just so we can stop sending Rovers and pretending they are discovering anything new. Part of the reason Mars and Jupiter are so popular is because they are fairly easy to get to from Earth. Anything beyond Jupiter requires more time (and rocket fuel) to get to; anything closer to the Sun than Earth requires elaborate and extensive maneuvers in order to shed the momentum given to it by the Earth. Mars and Jupiter happen to be in the sweet spot of study.

Again–not without good reason. Jupiter, for all it’s observation, is still fairly enigmatic. Personally, my favorite thing about Jupiter is it’s moons. My fascination there began with 2001: A Space Odyssey and has evolved since then. Ganymede with it’s varied terrain, Io with it’s volcanism. Europa I believe will be getting it’s own mission launched in 2022. Jupiter currently has a probe named Juno orbiting it, but due to a technical issue is stuck in a long 53 day elliptical polar orbit. I believe it was supposed to move into a tighter orbit around Jupiter but wasn’t able to. I don’t know how this has impacted the intended scientific study but the images have certainly been spectacular–prior to Juno no one had seen the Jovian poles.

For Mars, I think it’s been fairly established that there is currently water on Mars and it used to be a warmer, wetter planet. Mars’ molten iron core solidified and so it’s dynamic magnetic field disappeared, which allowed it’s atmosphere to gradually deplete and it turned into the deserted world we know and love today. We also can be reasonably certain there are microbes of some kind on Mars. Popular Science will call this “life” but that’s only to make people think of aliens–it’s the equivalent of going to Greenland and finding moss on a rock. It does not strike me as unusual that microbes would be on Mars–in fact, I would be rather surprised if they weren’t, personally. I would enjoy some detailed study of Mars’ moons but they are so small that it would be almost impossible to orbit them, let alone land on them. It would be more of a rendezvous sequence than a landing. Russia tried sending a probe named Phobos Grunt (Phobos Ground) but due to technical issues it failed to return any observations and may have crashed into Mars.

Saturn has captured the popular imagination mostly thanks to it’s rings and the Cassini mission, but because the Cassini mission was so successful I think it has sapped the will to send another Cassini style probe any time soon. Until technology improves, the only study we will get of Saturn will likely be in passing.

My favorite recent mission was the fly by of Pluto. I watched that fairly eagerly because prior to arrival the only images we had were extremely low resolution. Pluto is a fascinating and dynamic world, the visit by New Horizons raised more questions than answers. Far from being a homogeneous snowball, it had mountains and valleys and the heart-shaped region is an enormous sea of frozen nitrogen. I would be curious to see a follow up mission.

Probably the two planets I am most interested in learning more about are Venus and Neptune. Venus is a good, close candidate for research but steals money away from Mars Mania so has not gotten a favorable look. The challenges involved with getting there and then peering through the dense and toxic atmosphere increase the cost hurdle. Neptune is deserving of a Cassini style orbiter but is much farther away than Saturn. We haven’t been since Voyager 2 and there is suspicion that Neptune’s moon Triton is a captured Kuiper Belt object because of it’s superficial resemblance to Pluto and it’s retrograde orbit.

The trade-off with any mission to space is speed, and weight. A fast rocket can’t stay in orbit and can’t be heavy, so can’t make a lot of observations. A slow rocket can stay in orbit but takes a long time just to get anywhere–when it does we can have a Cassini style orbiter which spends more than a decade in orbit and get lots of observations. This makes it much costlier as a consequence. This trade-off could be eased somewhat if we could cheaply launch rockets from the moon, but that just shifts the costs earlier in the production cycle. We have to get out of the Earth’s gravity well somehow, and unless we source and process materials directly from outside of earth, the gravity well will remain a dollar well, too.

This has been a ramble about space.