CCLIX – Infinite Games

I heard a talk recently that introduced a game theory concept to me, and it is tangent to a lot of things I like to talk about here on this blog and think about in my brain so you’re getting a post on it whether you like it or not.

The concept is Finite and Infinite games. A Finite game is a game with discrete rules, discrete winning conditions, which all players know about, and which all players agree to. Baseball is a finite game, Scrabble is a finite game. An Infinite game is a game without discrete rules, and no winning conditions; the key is to keep the game going. In an infinite game, you only lose by dropping out. If there is a winner at all, it’s the last one standing. The Cold War is an example of an infinite game.

The talk was in the context of business, and the speaker gave the example of contrasting Microsoft with Apple. The speaker was with an Apple executive and pulled out a handheld Microsoft device and said to them, “Hey, this product is way better than yours.” The executive turned to him and said “I’m sure it is” and that was that. The speaker supposed that if he were to do the same thing with an Apple product to a Microsoft executive, the Microsoft exec would scramble a team to inspect and look at it and figure out what works and what doesn’t. Microsoft plays a finite game–product vs product competition; Apple plays an infinite game–they are in the business of long term survival not product to product competition.

This concept struck me because it has applications in many aspects of our lives. Are you trying to be healthy? Don’t play the finite game (short term results) but play the infinite game (the only losing move is to stop playing). Are you trying to boost your career? Don’t compete with your colleagues, but make yourself indispensable.

Jordan Peterson had a separate and unrelated talk I saw but which I felt applied. He said taking the long view allows you to see yourself as a community of persons rather than just you. Every moment of your future is a version of you–what can you do to make that community appreciate your present self? If you think in terms of “win now” then you’ll sacrifice, you’ll take from your community of selves; if you think in the long term then their success in the future can come at your present expense now; and your goal becomes to set them up for success rather than yourself. The best way to keep playing is to incentivize people to keep playing with you.

What about Faith? Is Faith an infinite game or a finite game? It’s certainly not a finite game, insofar as there is not a winning condition. But there kind of is–Heaven. We can’t keep the game going forever, there is a finite end. We also know the rules. We can’t keep the game going, but we can at least keep playing for our entire lives. We aren’t competing against anyone but ourselves.

An incomplete thought for now but I think I will be referring back to this idea.

AMDG

CXCII – Sympathetic Joy

This is the fruit of some prayer. It might be a walk so please bear with me.

  1. Love includes and is frequently characterized as willing the good of another.
    • Experiencing pain at the good fortune of another is disordered because it is selfish or envious–one wants that good fortune for oneself.
    • Experiencing joy at the misfortune of others is disordered because it doesn’t desire the good of another.
    • Pain at the misfortune of others is ordered because it is empathetic; one feels the pain of the other and wills their consolation.
    • Joy at the fortune of others is ordered because it is sympathetic, good news for others is the fruit of willing their good, and cause for joy.
  2. Willing the good of another allows one to share in the good of another.
    • Sharing in the good of another means more than being happy that they are happy, but being happy for the same reason they are happy.
      • NB: It is possible for people to be happy for reasons that are disordered, I am not referring to those circumstances. Willing the properly ordered good allows one to share in that properly ordered good.
    • To be happy that they are happy is good, because the response of the joy of another is joy, which is ordered.
    • To be happy for the same reason they are happy is better, because their good is your good, per se.
      • The human condition is intimately connected. Doctrine states that the sin of one affects everyone around them; it makes sense that the good of one has an equal and opposite effect.
      • Willing the good of another is not selfish in itself because the object is not the good of the self. Good of the self is a de minimis benefit of willing the good of another.
  3. I, personally, struggle at times to internalize these ideas.
    • The last year has seen a lot of good fortune for a lot of people around me.
    • In moments of despair I have thought, “when is it my turn” or been frustrated that certain things I desired have not materialized in the way I wanted, but rather materialized in accordance with God’s will.
      • NB: Loving God means willing God’s good; but God is goodness, so rather it means willing what God wills and being happy that God wills it.
      • NB: My life has not been devoid of good fortune, but there are certain fortunes others have that I would like to also have. This is pain at the good fortune of others, which I have established is selfish and envious.
  4. In Prayer, thinking “Why do I have so little good fortune for myself”, the thought I was led to was “I have more good fortune than any of these others, individually, because God has allowed me to share in the good fortune of so many people.”
    • Said another way: “No good fortune? What do you think all that good news was for?”
    • I have been happy that they are happy but not for the same reason that they are happy.
    • I must prayerfully move beyond being happy that they are happy and make their reasons for joy my reasons for joy.

I hope this stream of consciousness is fruitful for others. Point #4 fell on me like a hammer, and I cannot rid myself of it. Once I see truth, I must assimilate it.

AMDG