(b) – I’ve Discovered a Contradiction

From Article V:

“I have rights, you can’t do this” does not carry as much weight as “You can’t do this because it is unjust”. The former is confounded by the additional fact that no one can agree what exactly our rights are; whereas the latter can be much more objective by working within the framework of existing law. Liberalism, however, intentionally hamstrings Government and prevents it from acting in the interests of society, because Liberalism is structured as if all government was tyranny.

 

From Article VII: 

The main innovation here is viewing Government as a moral authority: not to define what is right, but instead to preserve and promote what is right. As a Christian and a Catholic, I believe what is right is an objective standard, I believe in Natural Law. So a government which does not abide or promote Virtue, Natural Law, etc, is, in fact, Tyranny

I don’t know the consequences of it yet. But i see that this might be self contradictory. Or maybe not. I need to explore this.

(a) – A Technical Note

I just switched from ‘timesdispatch.home.blog’ to ‘timesdispatch.wordpress.com’. The latter is what I wanted originally, and the former is what I got and I didn’t understand why. If any links are broken, please let me know. Thank you!